LATEST POLL
IPP Sentences - the Nightmare
'IPP Sentences' - the 'Nightmare.' by David Wells
I was delighted to read in Converse recently of Government plans to end the IPP ‘nightmare’ - but my delight was short-lived when I quickly realised any changes they make will not be backdated and so won’t apply to those who are already serving this sentence: for them the IPP nightmare continues, and I’m determined to do what I can to help.
To impose a sentence, riddled with issues which mean no-one can realistically complete it, is nothing short of criminal in my opinion. Too many IPP prisoners remain in jail having completed their tariffs, sometimes having served years and years beyond the minimum term.
I’m not interested in any attempt to cover up the embarrassment that this sentence has caused successive Governments, on the contrary my mission is to expose it. The truth is that IPP sentences don’t work, they destroy the lives of prisoners, and ruin the lives of their families too - the Parole Board is no better.
They moan about heavy caseloads, while others just argue IPP prisoners are responsible for prison overcrowding and are a drain on resources - whatever the problems are, they are NOT the fault of the serving IPP prisoner. Courts impose IPP sentences with no regard to long-term mental anguish for the inmate and the breakdown in family relationships they create.
As the Parole Board buckles under pressure they become more and more ill equipped to make informed decisions on risk - evolving in to an organisation that is allergic to risk and, as a former Parole Board Chairman shockingly admitted they detain prisoners over tariff rather than release those who only ‘might’ re-offend.
The problems faced by IPP inmates, who are often some of the most vulnerable people in society, illustrates how such prisoners have been neglected. I genuinely hope that if the law does change, those that remain in the system are shown dignity and respect - and I will do my level best to ensure that happens for my IPP clients.
What we must do is give prisons the vital resources they need for IPP sentence progression; allow IPPs access to courses, setting achievable targets - and house IPPs in prisons offering the right Offender Behaviour Programmes.
Even those IPPs deemed to have the intellectual capacity to attend courses (and many through no fault of their own who do not) will ultimately be assessed for release on ‘risk’, and risk that is itself founded on wholly inadequate contact with probation, and reports prepared by, at best, wholly inexperienced staff. These reports are often done at the very last minute, by those with virtually no knowledge of the prisoner at all, other than what they read - and what they read has often been written by others like themselves, in a rush and with a tragically similar lack of knowledge of the inmate concerned that they possess themselves.
How can my firm, Wells Burcombe help?
I think in two ways.
Firstly we’ll see if we can appeal the IPP sentence itself and, secondly, work out how to get you to the right jail with the right courses for YOU. The reports asserting your “continued risk” will be ‘fine tooth-combed’, we’ll help you to make meaningful representations at the time of release, and we’ll do our level best in any oral hearings before the Parole Board to get you released at the right time, and off home to your loved ones.
If you are an IPP inmate who needs my firm's kind of help and outlook, our contact details are on the right.
YOUR COMMENTS
Featured Article
Latest Employment Law Articles
- Compulsory Retirement – not a meaningless matter for the closed mind
- Do Employees accrue holidays whilst on sickness absence?
- Human resources and social networking
- Avoiding Religious Discrimination in the Workplace
- Family Friendly and Flexible Working
- Age Discrimination – why is it so important to comply with the Law?
- Cadbury’s takeover leaves a bitter taste
- Training and Study Leave - New Law for Employees
- Volcanic ash - making a mountain out of a molehill?
- 'Fit Notes' - A Guidance on the New System
Latest Criminal Law Articles
- IPP Sentences - the Nightmare
- Changes to funding of prison law cases
- Appeals against conviction - conduct of trial lawyers
- Facial Mapping Evidence
- Access To Justice
- Does prison fail inmates with mental illness?
- Fresh evidence and the Criminal Cases Review Commission
- Appeals from the Crown Court against conviction and/or sentence
- The Offender Assessment System - OASys
- Talking sense about Motoring
Latest Personal Injury Articles
- CAN PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS BE MADE AGAINST COMPANIES IN LIQUIDATION OR NO LONGER TRADING?
- TRUCK AND TRAILER ACCIDENT CLAIMS
- WHY DEFECTIVE WORK EQUIPMENT ACCIDENT CLAIMS ARE USUALLY SUCCESSFUL
- SUCCESSFUL ‘REAR END SHUNT’ ROAD ACCIDENT CLAIMS
- Court of Appeal clarifies the rules on Part 36 Offers
- HOW COMPENSATION FOR ACCIDENT RELATED INJURIES IS CALCULATED
- THE IMPORTANCE OF STRONG MEDICAL EVIDENCE IN SUCCESSFUL PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS
- SLIPPING AND TRIPPING ACCIDENT CLAIMS
- Permanent Disability - Case Study
- PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS - HOW MUCH IS MY INJURY COMPENSATION CLAIM WORTH?

