LATEST POLL
Cadbury’s takeover leaves a bitter taste
Last week the Takeover Panel Executive issued a statement of public criticism of Kraft Foods Inc. for failing to meet the standards of care and accuracy required by the Takeover Code when making statements about Cadbury’s Somerdale facility during the course of its offer for Cadbury. Kraft repeatedly issued statements that it would be in a position to keep the Somerdale facility running and " to invest in Bournville, thereby preserving UK manufacturing jobs.".
The Panel accepted that Kraft had only had access to “limited information” in the public domain when making such statements. When Kraft took over earlier this year, it was apparently only then that the company realised that Cadbury's plans to close the Somerdale facility were so far advanced that it was unrealistic to reverse them and that in excess of £100 million had already been invested by Cadbury in building new facilities in Poland to which the Somerdale production lines would be transferred. The Takeover Panel’s main criticism of Kraft was that its repeated announcements that it could continue to operate the facility in the UK had “no reasonable factual basis” whatsoever.
Here at Renney & Co we find it quite remarkable that Kraft was unaware of Cadbury’s irreversible financial commitment to transfer the business to Poland. No doubt Cadbury’s hundreds of redundant staff will also be asking themselves how it is that Kraft was so ignorant of the facts, and able to make such empty promises, leaving a bitter taste in everyone’s mouth.
At Renney & Co we advise businesses and individuals on the rights and wrongs of redundancy situations. If you are looking for advice on redundancy or business transfers, feel free to give us a ring. As a sweetener we offer a no obligation telephone consultation.
YOUR COMMENTS
Featured Article
Latest Employment Law Articles
- Compulsory Retirement – not a meaningless matter for the closed mind
- Do Employees accrue holidays whilst on sickness absence?
- Human resources and social networking
- Avoiding Religious Discrimination in the Workplace
- Family Friendly and Flexible Working
- Age Discrimination – why is it so important to comply with the Law?
- Cadbury’s takeover leaves a bitter taste
- Training and Study Leave - New Law for Employees
- Volcanic ash - making a mountain out of a molehill?
- 'Fit Notes' - A Guidance on the New System
Latest Criminal Law Articles
- IPP Sentences - the Nightmare
- Changes to funding of prison law cases
- Appeals against conviction - conduct of trial lawyers
- Facial Mapping Evidence
- Access To Justice
- Does prison fail inmates with mental illness?
- Fresh evidence and the Criminal Cases Review Commission
- Appeals from the Crown Court against conviction and/or sentence
- The Offender Assessment System - OASys
- Talking sense about Motoring
Latest Personal Injury Articles
- CAN PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS BE MADE AGAINST COMPANIES IN LIQUIDATION OR NO LONGER TRADING?
- TRUCK AND TRAILER ACCIDENT CLAIMS
- WHY DEFECTIVE WORK EQUIPMENT ACCIDENT CLAIMS ARE USUALLY SUCCESSFUL
- SUCCESSFUL ‘REAR END SHUNT’ ROAD ACCIDENT CLAIMS
- Court of Appeal clarifies the rules on Part 36 Offers
- HOW COMPENSATION FOR ACCIDENT RELATED INJURIES IS CALCULATED
- THE IMPORTANCE OF STRONG MEDICAL EVIDENCE IN SUCCESSFUL PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS
- SLIPPING AND TRIPPING ACCIDENT CLAIMS
- Permanent Disability - Case Study
- PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS - HOW MUCH IS MY INJURY COMPENSATION CLAIM WORTH?

